Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 5770 Asus v2 Edition Radeon R7 260
Halo: Reach 42% 3%
Cyberpunk 2077 513% 345%
Red Dead Redemption 2 346% 224%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 175% 100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 346% 224%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 513% 345%
Doom Eternal 283% 179%
Grand Theft Auto VI 581% 395%
FIFA 20 138% 73%
Need For Speed Heat 346% 224%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 5770 Asus v2 Edition.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 5770. This results in the Radeon R7 260 providing 14 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 5770 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 260 providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 260 was released over three years more recently than the HD 5770, and so the Radeon R7 260 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD 5770 when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 260 has 1024 MB more video memory than the HD 5770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Radeon R7 260 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Radeon R7 260 has 19.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 5770, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is slightly better than the HD 5770.

The Radeon HD 5770 Asus v2 Edition has 800 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260 has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 5770 is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653. The Radeon R7 260 having 313 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R7 260 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 5770.

The Radeon R7 260 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 5770. This means that the Radeon R7 260 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 5770.

The Radeon HD 5770 Asus v2 Edition requires 150 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the HD 5770 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260. The HD 5770 requires 55 Watts more than the Radeon R7 260 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 5770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R7 260.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs1000 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Juniper XTGCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date01 Nov 2009vs17 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
9.7
1600x900
6
vs green tick
7.5
1920x1080
4.9
vs green tick
5.7
2560x1440
3
vs green tick
4
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.4

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth76.8GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units800vs768
Actual Shader Performance16%vs31%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs48
Texture Rate34 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium Dual Core E6700 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM6 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon HD 5770 Asus v2 Edition is a special edition of the Radeon HD 5770. See the page of the standard edition for more information about it.
Compared to the Radeon HD 5770, this Special Edition has exactly the same specifications and we do not know of any special features that might boost its performance or any other tweaks.
Therefore, the performance is EXACTLY like the standard Radeon HD 5770 1GB.
Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body