Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i5 655K Radeon HD 8370D
Cyberpunk 2077 4076% 3392%
Minecraft: Dungeons 3110% 2584%
Call of Duty Warzone 2940% 2442%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4545% 3784%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 4076% 3392%
Valorant 198% 149%
Maneater 2514% 2085%
Phantasy Star Online 2 326% 256%
Doom Eternal 2997% 2489%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 2826% 2347%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8370D are noticeably better than the Intel HD i5 655K.

The Radeon HD 8370D was released over three years more recently than the HD i5 655K, and so the Radeon HD 8370D is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the HD i5 655K when running the latest games.

The HD i5 655K and the Radeon HD 8370D have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon HD 8370D has 23.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD i5 655K, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon HD 8370D is slightly better than the HD i5 655K.

The Radeon HD 8370D has 128 Shader Processing Units but the HD i5 655K does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i5 655K requires 73 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 8370D requires 65 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon HD 8370D, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the HD i5 655K. The HD i5 655K requires 8 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8370D to run. The difference is not significant enough for the HD i5 655K to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD 8370D.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed733 MHzvs760 MHz
Boost Clock-vs844 MHz
ArchitectureClarkdaleTerascale 2 Thames PRO
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date30 Mar 2010vs18 Sep 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed667 MHzvs1067 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth10.7GB/secvs34.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs128
Actual Shader Performance-vs3%
Technology-vs40nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs24
Texture Rate-vs18.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs8
Pixel Rate-vs6.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power73 Wattsvs65 Watts
Recommended PSU-450 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX10vs11.0
Shader Model4.0vs5.0
Open GL2.1vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-655K 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i3-3110M 2.4GHz
Recommended RAM-4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewN/ARadeon HD 8370D is an embedded Graphics Card on the low end Richland APUs like the A4-6300, A4-6320
They offer 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The memory interface depends on whether or not the system's RAM is dual channelled.
While the central unit runs at 760MHz, since the GFX doesn't have dedicated memory, the bandwidth will depend on the system ram speed which can be up to 2133MHz (the max speed supported by the CPU). Therefore, the max boost clock is 844MHz.
Th graphical performance is not top end by todays integrated graphics standards
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-