Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro K4200 GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 172% 194%
Cyberpunk 2077 274% 304%
Doom Eternal 134% 153%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 172% 194%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 68% 81%
Halo: Reach 13% 7%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 274% 304%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 274% 304%
Grand Theft Auto VI 316% 349%
Need For Speed Heat 172% 194%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K4200 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 352 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4200, but the Quadro K4200 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K4200 exhibits a 45.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 352 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K4200, but the Quadro K4200 has 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the Quadro K4200 exhibits a 5.7 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Quadro K4200 was released less than a year after the GTX 750, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Quadro K4200 has 3072 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K4200 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K4200 has 92.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K4200 is massively better than the GTX 750.

The Quadro K4200 has 1344 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4200 is 949 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 786. The Quadro K4200 having 163 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K4200 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The Quadro K4200 requires 108 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Quadro K4200 and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750. The Quadro K4200 has been recommended a PSU with 100 Watts more than the GTX 750. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K4200 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed706 MHzvs1058 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1137 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK104Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Great vs Good
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date22 Jul 2014vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
7.9
1920x1080 - vs green tick
6
2560x1440 - vs green tick
4.2
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1253 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth172.8GB/secvs80.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1344vs512
Actual Shader Performance46%vs38%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units112vs32
Texture Rate79.1 GTexel/svs33.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs16
Pixel Rate22.6 GPixel/svs16.9 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power108 Watts-
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs400 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro K4200 is a high-end professional card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.

It's based on the Kepler GK107 and offers 1344 Shader Processing Units, 112 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 1350MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 512KB and a rated board TDP of 108 Watts.

Quadro K4200's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is around 10% slower than GeForce GTX 660.
GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1058MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1137MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 4% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus this card is slightly faster than Radeon R7 260X.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body