Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro K2200 Radeon R7 250X
Red Dead Redemption 2 317% 312%
Doom Eternal 258% 254%
Cyberpunk 2077 473% 465%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 317% 312%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 157% 154%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 473% 465%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 473% 465%
Grand Theft Auto VI 537% 529%
Need For Speed Heat 317% 312%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 84% 84%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 250X are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro K2200.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 283 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Quadro K2200. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 11.3 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 250X has a 283 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro K2200 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 250X providing 4.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Quadro K2200 was released less than a year after the Radeon R7 250X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Quadro K2200 has 2048 MB more video memory than the Radeon R7 250X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K2200 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K2200 has 8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R7 250X, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K2200 is marginally better than the Radeon R7 250X.

Both the Quadro K2200 and the Radeon R7 250X have 640 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Quadro K2200 is 576 and by the Radeon R7 250X is 517. Knowing that the shader performance of the Quadro K2200 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Quadro K2200 requires 68 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 250X requires 80 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Quadro K2200 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 250X. The Radeon R7 250X requires 12 Watts more than the Quadro K2200 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 250X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Quadro K2200.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed667 MHzvs950 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107GCN 1.0 Cape Verde XT
OC Potential Great vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date22 Jul 2014vs10 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
8.8
1600x900 - vs green tick
6.6
1920x1080 - vs green tick
5.1
2560x1440 - vs green tick
3.4
3840x2160 - vs green tick
2.2

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1125 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs72GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs640
Actual Shader Performance28%vs25%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs40
Texture Rate26.7 GTexel/svs38 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate10.7 GPixel/svs15.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power68 Wattsvs80 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs450 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro K2200 is a fast-middle-class professional card based on the 28nm, Maxwell architecture.

It's based on the Maxwell GM107 and offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 667MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 1250MHz. It has a L2 Cache of 2048KB and a rated board TDP of 68 Watts.

Quadro K2200's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is about 15% slower than GeForce GTX 750.
Radeon R7 250X is a fast-middle-class Graphics Card based on the Graphics Core Next architecture. It offers the Cape Verde XT GPU.
The Cape Verde XT Core is a GCN 1.1 GPU and was first seen on Radeon HD 7770 and then re-used in the OEM only Radeon HD 8760.
It offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bits memory interface of fast GDDR5.
Radeon R7 250X comes clocked at 950MHz (though there might be some 1GHz versions) and has its operating memory clock set at 1125MHz. The rated TDP board is of 80W and the release price around $99.
This card should come in 1GB and 2GB versions, though both will offer the same performance.
Its performance has proven to be exactly like Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition (if clocked at 1GHz) and thus this card is not suited for 1080p gaming but it can handle 720p with ease. The 950MHz versions will be around 3% slower.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body