Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) Quadro4 780 XGL
Red Dead Redemption 2 4512% 4854%
Doom Eternal 3866% 4159%
Cyberpunk 2077 6236% 6706%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4512% 4854%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2745% 2956%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6236% 6706%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6236% 6706%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6947% 7469%
Need For Speed Heat 4512% 4854%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 78% 91%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Graphics Desktop has a 36 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL, but the Quadro4 780 XGL has 7 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics Desktop. As a result, the Quadro4 780 XGL exhibits a 1.9 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Graphics Desktop. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Graphics Desktop has a 36 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL, but the Quadro4 780 XGL has 3 more Render Output Units than the Graphics Desktop. As a result, the Quadro4 780 XGL exhibits a 0.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Graphics Desktop. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 9 or higher, so Pixel Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Graphics Desktop was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the Graphics Desktop is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the Graphics Desktop does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) and the Quadro4 780 XGL have 4 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Graphics Desktop is 18 and by the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the Graphics Desktop is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Graphics Desktop transistor size technology is 128 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 780 XGL. This means that the Graphics Desktop is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 780 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics Desktop should consume less power than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) requires 10 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed311 MHzvs275 MHz
Boost Clock896 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIvy Bridge: Bay TrailNV28
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Sep 2013vs01 Nov 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs275 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs4.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance1%vs0%
Technology22nmvs150nm
Texture Mapping Units1vs8
Texture Rate0.3 GTexel/svs2.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units1vs4
Pixel Rate0.3 GPixel/svs1.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power10 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs8.1
Shader Model5.0vs1.3
Open GL4.0vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Pentium J2900 2.41GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIntel HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) are integrated graphics in the low-end Atoms and nettop processors.

Their performance depends on the processor they are integrated on, as the latter defines the Base and Boost Clock, as well as on the SYSTEM RAM, which defines the operating memory clock, and whether the GPU accesses a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 4MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Best case scenario, the Intel HD Graphics Desktop (Bay Trail) perform only slightly below the Intel HD 2000 Graphics and so most modern demanding games will have to be played with the lowest settings, while some aren't even playable.
Quadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body