Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro S9150 | FireStream 9370 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 62% | 257% |
Hitman 3 | 111% | 365% |
Resident Evil 8 | 62% | 257% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 48% | 227% |
FIFA 21 | 18% | 80% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 128% | 403% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 44% | 216% |
Genshin Impact | 62% | 257% |
Far Cry 6 | 135% | 417% |
The Medium | 103% | 346% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro S9150 are massively better than the AMD FireStream 9370.
The FirePro S9150 was released over three years more recently than the FireStream 9370, and so the FirePro S9150 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the FireStream 9370 when running the latest games.
The FirePro S9150 has 12288 MB more video memory than the FireStream 9370, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9150 has 166.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the FireStream 9370, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is massively better than the FireStream 9370.
The FirePro S9150 has 2816 Shader Processing Units and the FireStream 9370 has 1600. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534 and the actual shader performance of the FireStream 9370 is 858. The FirePro S9150 having 1676 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9150 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FireStream 9370.
The FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts to run and the FireStream 9370 requires 225 Watts. The FirePro S9150 requires 10 Watts more than the FireStream 9370 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the FirePro S9150 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the FireStream 9370.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | 825 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | RV870 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Poor | |
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 01 Aug 2014 | ![]() | vs | 23 Jun 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | 16384 MB | ![]() | vs | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 320GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 153.6GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2816 | ![]() | vs | 1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | 41% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 176 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 158.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 57.6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 235 Watts | vs | ![]() | 225 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 11.2 | ![]() | vs | 11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.2 | ![]() | vs | 4.0 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 5760x1600 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ. Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X. | The FireStream 9370 offers maximum GPU performance with 4GB of DDR5 memory in a 2-slot configuration. The FireStream 9350 offers maximum performance / slot with 2GB DDR5 memory in a 1-slot configuration. Both boards are passively cooled and include a single Display Port output. (For workstation installations that require active cooling of the GPU, AMD’s ATI FirePro™ professional graphics boards are software compatible and offer comparable features.) |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |