Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro S9150 | GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 62% | 29% |
Hitman 3 | 111% | 67% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 48% | 18% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 44% | 14% |
FIFA 21 | 18% | 35% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 128% | 81% |
Far Cry 6 | 135% | 86% |
Genshin Impact | 62% | 29% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 133% | 84% |
Battlefield 6 | 111% | 67% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II Edition are noticeably better than the AMD FirePro S9150.
The FirePro S9150 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 780, but the GTX 780 has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro S9150. As a result, the GTX 780 exhibits a 7.3 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the FirePro S9150. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The FirePro S9150 has a 37 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the GTX 780. This results in the FirePro S9150 providing 16.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro S9150 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 780, and so the FirePro S9150 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 780.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The FirePro S9150 has 13312 MB more video memory than the GTX 780, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9150 has 31.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 780, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is noticeably better than the GTX 780.
The FirePro S9150 has 2816 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II Edition has 2304. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780 is 2078. The FirePro S9150 having 456 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 780 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX 780, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9150.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | 863 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | ![]() | 902 MHz | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | Kepler GK110-300-A1 | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Aug 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Jul 2013 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
9.3
|
|
2560x1440 | - | vs | ![]() |
6.9
|
|
3840x2160 | - | vs | ![]() |
5.2
|
Memory | 16384 MB | ![]() | vs | 3072 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1502 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | 384 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 320GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 288.4GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | vs | ![]() |
1536 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2816 | ![]() | vs | 2304 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 176 | vs | ![]() | 192 | |
Texture Rate | 158.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 165.7 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | 48 | |
Pixel Rate | 57.6 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 41.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 235 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 600 Watts |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.2 | vs | ![]() | 4.5 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 5760x1600 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1440 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ. Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X. | GeForce GTX 780 DirectCU II Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX 780. This edition comes with a custom dual fan cooling solution which should allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 780 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology. It does not have any overclocking out of the box. Benchmarks indicate a 1% performance boost when compared to the reference card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |