Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | FirePro S9150 | Radeon HD 7870 Crossfire |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 62% | 40% |
Hitman 3 | 111% | 83% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 48% | 28% |
Resident Evil 8 | 62% | 40% |
FIFA 21 | 18% | 29% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 128% | 98% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 44% | 24% |
Genshin Impact | 62% | 40% |
The Medium | 103% | 75% |
Far Cry 6 | 135% | 103% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 7870 Crossfire are very slightly better than the AMD FirePro S9150.
The HD 7870 has a 100 MHz higher core clock speed but 16 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro S9150. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the HD 7870 manages to provide 1.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 7870 has a 100 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 7870 providing 6.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The FirePro S9150 was released over a year more recently than the HD 7870, and so the FirePro S9150 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7870.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The FirePro S9150 has 12288 MB more video memory than the HD 7870, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9150 has 12.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 7870, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is slightly better than the HD 7870.
The FirePro S9150 has 2816 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7870 Crossfire has 2560. However, the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7870 is 2176. The FirePro S9150 having 358 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 7870 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 7870 Crossfire requires 350 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the HD 7870, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the FirePro S9150. The HD 7870 requires 115 Watts more than the FirePro S9150 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7870 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the FirePro S9150.
Core Speed | 900 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | GCN 1.0 Pitcairn XT (x2) | |||
OC Potential | Good |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | - | vs | Good | ||
Release Date | 01 Aug 2014 | ![]() | vs | 01 Mar 2012 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
1920x1080 | - | vs | ![]() |
9
|
|
2560x1440 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 16384 MB | ![]() | vs | 4096 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1250 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1200 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 512 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 320GB/sec | ![]() | vs | 307.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
1024 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2816 | ![]() | vs | 2560 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 176 | ![]() | vs | 160 | |
Texture Rate | 158.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 160 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 57.6 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 64 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4096x2160 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 235 Watts | ![]() | vs | 350 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | 600 Watts |
DirectX | 11.2 | vs | ![]() | 12.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.2 | vs | ![]() | 4.4 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 | vs | ![]() | Intel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 16 GB | vs | ![]() | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 5760x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ. Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X. | Radeon HD 7870 Crossfire is a solution of two Radeon HD 7870 put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology. Check the page of Radeon HD 7870 to know more about its chip. Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is up to 44% better than a single Radeon HD 7870 performing by itself it might be worse (depending on whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) than a single Radeon HD 7870. Expect this combination to draw up to 350 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower. Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | ||||
GPU Variants | - | - |