Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R2 6200T GeForce 320M
Cyberpunk 2077 3400% 2389%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3130% 2197%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 3494% 2456%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 4963% 3500%
Genshin Impact 3431% 2411%
eFootball PES 2021 1681% 1167%
FIFA 21 1681% 1167%
Watch Dogs Legion 3306% 2322%
Death Stranding 3431% 2411%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 3025% 2122%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 320M are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R2 6200T.

The GeForce 320M has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R2 6200T. This results in the GeForce 320M providing 4.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 320M has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the Radeon R2 6200T. This results in the GeForce 320M providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R2 6200T was released over three years more recently than the GeForce 320M, and so the Radeon R2 6200T is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce 320M when running the latest games.

The Radeon R2 6200T and the GeForce 320M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce 320M has 12.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon R2 6200T, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 320M is slightly better than the Radeon R2 6200T.

The Radeon R2 6200T has 128 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 320M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R2 6200T is 25 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 320M is 45. The GeForce 320M having 20 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 320M delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R2 6200T.

The Radeon R2 6200T transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 320M. This means that the Radeon R2 6200T is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 320M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon R2 6200T should consume less power than the GeForce 320M.

The Radeon R2 6200T requires 4 Watts to run and the GeForce 320M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce 320M requires 19 Watts more than the Radeon R2 6200T to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 320M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R2 6200T.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitecturePuma Mullins ML-A1Tesla MCP89
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date29 Apr 2014vs01 Apr 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - vs green tick
1920x1080 - vs green tick
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory Speed533 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth8.5GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units128vs48
Actual Shader Performance1%vs2%
Texture Mapping Units8vs16
Texture Rate2.4 GTexel/svs7.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs8
Pixel Rate1.2 GPixel/svs3.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power4 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU E1 Micro-6200T Dual-CorevsIntel Core i3-M330 2.13GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768vs1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R2 6200T is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU E1 Micro-6200T Dual Core.
It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 300MHz, the memory bus-width will be of 64-bit, as the processor only support single channeled RAM. The memory clock runs at up to 533MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 1MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.
Therefore, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance around 5% worse than the integrated Intel HD 2500.
The card is only suited for gaming below 720p and not all modern demanding games can be played, even at least on low settings.
GeForce 320M is an Integrated Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Tesla Architecture.

Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture.

It equips a GPU Codenamed Tesla MCP89 which has 4 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 48 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 450MHz.

The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 256MB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

DirectX 10.1 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 14W, it may be used on very small notebooks.

Gaming benchmarks put its performance considerably above the desktop GeForce 210.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants