Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R6 7300 GeForce GTS 360M
Cyberpunk 2077 1076% 1154%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 975% 1047%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 941% 1010%
FIFA 21 493% 533%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 941% 1010%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1586% 1698%
Watch Dogs Legion 1034% 1110%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 1013% 1088%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1555% 1665%
Genshin Impact 1076% 1154%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R6 7300 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M.

The GeForce GTS 360M has a 17 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R6 7300. This results in the GeForce GTS 360M providing 4.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTS 360M has a 17 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R6 7300 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce GTS 360M providing 0.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R6 7300 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTS 360M, and so the Radeon R6 7300 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTS 360M when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTS 360M has 1024 MB video memory, but the Radeon R6 7300 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R6 7300 has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTS 360M has 96. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R6 7300 is 133 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTS 360M is 121. The Radeon R6 7300 having 12 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce GTS 360M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R6 7300 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTS 360M. This means that the Radeon R6 7300 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTS 360M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon R6 7300 should consume less power than the GeForce GTS 360M.

The Radeon R6 7300 requires 20 Watts to run and the GeForce GTS 360M requires 38 Watts. The GeForce GTS 360M requires 18 Watts more than the Radeon R6 7300 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTS 360M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R6 7300.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKaveriGT215
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Jun 2014vs07 Jan 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs57.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs96
Actual Shader Performance6%vs6%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs32
Texture Rate12.8 GTexel/svs17.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate4.3 GPixel/svs4.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs38 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.1
Open GL4.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-7300 Quad-CorevsIntel Core i7-740QM 4-Core 1.73GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1440x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R6 7300 is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A10-7300.

It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 533MHz, the memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 800MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 4MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Overall, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance superior to a dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M or an AMD Radeon R5 M230.
The card is thus suited for 720p gaming and some modern demanding games can be played at least on medium settings.
GeForce GTS 360M is a fast-middle-class GFX based on the second shader unified architecture.
It's based on the GT 215 Core and offers 96 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 8 ROPs on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5, although DDR3 is also supported. The central unit runs at 575MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 900MHz.
It's at heart an overclocked GeForce GTS 260M and should perform slightly better than it.
Today's modern demanding games can be played at medium settings smoothly, using a 720p resolution. Beware that DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-