Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R6 7300 GeForce GT 240M
Cyberpunk 2077 1076% 1783%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 975% 1623%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 941% 1567%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 941% 1567%
FIFA 21 493% 850%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 857% 1433%
Genshin Impact 1076% 1783%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1555% 2550%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1586% 2600%
Watch Dogs Legion 1034% 1717%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R6 7300 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GT 240M.

The GeForce GT 240M has a 17 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R6 7300, but the Radeon R6 7300 has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GT 240M. As a result, the Radeon R6 7300 exhibits a 4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce GT 240M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GT 240M has a 17 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R6 7300 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce GT 240M providing 0.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R6 7300 was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GT 240M, and so the Radeon R6 7300 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GT 240M when running the latest games.

The GeForce GT 240M has 1024 MB video memory, but the Radeon R6 7300 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R6 7300 has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GT 240M has 48. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R6 7300 is 133 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GT 240M is 58. The Radeon R6 7300 having 75 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R6 7300 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GT 240M.

The Radeon R6 7300 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GT 240M. This means that the Radeon R6 7300 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GT 240M.

The Radeon R6 7300 requires 20 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 240M requires 23 Watts. The GeForce GT 240M requires 3 Watts more than the Radeon R6 7300 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GT 240M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R6 7300.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKaveriTesla GT216-N10P-GS
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date30 Jun 2014vs01 Jun 2009
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs48
Actual Shader Performance6%vs3%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs16
Texture Rate12.8 GTexel/svs8.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate4.3 GPixel/svs4.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs23 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs10.1
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.3vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-7300 Quad-Core-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R6 7300 is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A10-7300.

It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 533MHz, the memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 800MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 4MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Overall, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance superior to a dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M or an AMD Radeon R5 M230.
The card is thus suited for 720p gaming and some modern demanding games can be played at least on medium settings.
GeForce GT 240M is a middle-class level GPU of the 200M Series released by NVIDIA in 2009/2010. The biggest hindrance it has is the fact that it only supports DirectX up to 10.1 so DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
It's based on the architecture 'GT216', same used on the GeForce GT 230M and features the exact same amount of Pipelines and same memory type. The only difference is the increased clock frequencies. Therefore, GeForce GT 240M is just a fast GeForce GT 230M.
Demanding games should run at low or medium settings, depending on the resolution + DirectX version used. Very demanding games like Metro 2033 might be unplayable even at the lowest settings or only playable at the lowest resolution, which is unbearable, even to the casual gamer. Even old demanding games like Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare cannot be played at MAX settings smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-