Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R6 7300 Radeon R7 M260
Cyberpunk 2077 1076% 1030%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 975% 934%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 941% 900%
FIFA 21 493% 470%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 941% 900%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1586% 1520%
Watch Dogs Legion 1034% 990%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 1013% 970%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1555% 1490%
Genshin Impact 1076% 1030%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 M260 are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R6 7300.

The Radeon R7 M260 has a 407 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Radeon R6 7300. This results in the Radeon R7 M260 providing 9.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 M260 has a 407 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R6 7300 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 M260 providing 3.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R6 7300 was released less than a year after the Radeon R7 M260, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R7 M260 has 2048 MB video memory, but the Radeon R6 7300 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Radeon R6 7300 and the Radeon R7 M260 have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Radeon R7 M260 is 320 and by the Radeon R6 7300 is 320. Knowing that the shader performance of the Radeon R7 M260 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The Radeon R6 7300 requires 20 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 M260 requires 35 Watts. The Radeon R7 M260 requires 15 Watts more than the Radeon R6 7300 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 M260 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R6 7300.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs940 MHz
Boost Clock-vs980 MHz
ArchitectureKaveriGCN 1.1 Topaz XT
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support - vs Great
Release Date30 Jun 2014vs11 Jun 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
5.4
1600x900 - vs green tick
4
1920x1080 - vs green tick
2.7
2560x1440 - vs green tick
1.9
3840x2160 - vs green tick
1.2

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs16GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance6%vs15%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs24
Texture Rate12.8 GTexel/svs22.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate4.3 GPixel/svs7.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs35 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-7300 Quad-CorevsIntel Core i5-4200M 2.5GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R6 7300 is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A10-7300.

It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 533MHz, the memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 800MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 4MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Overall, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance superior to a dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M or an AMD Radeon R5 M230.
The card is thus suited for 720p gaming and some modern demanding games can be played at least on medium settings.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS GRAPHICS CARD HAS 2 VARIANTS: DDR3 + 64-bit AND DDR3 + 128-bit. THIS IS THE DDR3 + 64-bit VARIANT.

Radeon R7 M260 is a middle-class mobile graphics card. It is based on 28nm Topaz XT Core of the GCN 1.1 architecture.

Radeon R7 M260 offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 64-bit of DDR3. While the central unit runs at 940MHz and goes up to 980MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1000MHz. It has a rated TDP board of around 35W.

This version is even worse suited for higher resolutions but it is expected to perform better than its 128-bit counterpart at lower resolutions and in certain games. Still, the 128-bit should still be overall slightly faster.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-