Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R6 7300 GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 1076% 821%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 975% 742%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 941% 715%
FIFA 21 493% 365%
Watch Dogs Legion 1034% 788%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 941% 715%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1586% 1220%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1555% 1196%
Godfall 1809% 1396%
Genshin Impact 1076% 821%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 8800M GTX SLI are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R6 7300.

The Radeon R6 7300 was released over three years more recently than the 8800M GTX, and so the Radeon R6 7300 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 8800M GTX when running the latest games.

The 8800M GTX has 2048 MB video memory, but the Radeon R6 7300 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon R6 7300 has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI has 192. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R6 7300 is 133 and the actual shader performance of the 8800M GTX is 96. The Radeon R6 7300 having 37 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the 8800M GTX performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R6 7300 transistor size technology is 37 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 8800M GTX. This means that the Radeon R6 7300 is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 8800M GTX.

The Radeon R6 7300 requires 20 Watts to run and the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI requires 130 Watts. The 8800M GTX requires 110 Watts more than the Radeon R6 7300 to run. The difference is significant enough that the 8800M GTX may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon R6 7300.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKaveriG92 (x2)
OC Potential None vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Jun 2014vs01 Nov 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs2048 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs204.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 4096 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs192
Actual Shader Performance6%vs5%
Technology28nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units24vs-
Texture Rate12.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units8vs-
Pixel Rate4.3 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power20 Wattsvs130 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.3vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-7300 Quad-Core-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R6 7300 is an integrated Graphics Card in the APU A10-7300.

It is based on the Graphics Core Next Architecture and offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs. While the central unit is set at 533MHz, the memory bus-width will depend on whether or not the system's RAM is dual-channeled and the operating memory clock, on its frequency. Thus, it can be either 64-bit or 128-bit and up to 800MHz.
The Graphics Card also shares the processor's L2 Cache of 4MB. Therefore, it reduces the need to resort to its memory bandwidth.

Overall, the Graphics Card's performance depends a lot on the system configuration. Best case scenario, expect performance superior to a dedicated NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M or an AMD Radeon R5 M230.
The card is thus suited for 720p gaming and some modern demanding games can be played at least on medium settings.
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a solution of two GeForce 8800M GTX put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce 8800M GTX to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce 8800M GTX performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce 8800M GTX.
A few demanding games will run at the highest settings with fluent frame rates (30+) but overall most games will require reduced settings to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-