Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 880M 4GB GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Halo: Reach 40% 37%
Cyberpunk 2077 158% 172%
Red Dead Redemption 2 88% 98%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 16% 22%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88% 98%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 158% 172%
Doom Eternal 61% 70%
Grand Theft Auto VI 187% 203%
FIFA 20 0% 6%
Need For Speed Heat 88% 98%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M 4GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

The GTX 880M has a 334 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GTX 675M. This results in the GTX 880M providing 42.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 880M has a 334 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 675M, but the GTX 675M has 32 more Render Output Units than the GTX 880M. As a result, the GTX 675M exhibits a 9.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 880M. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 880M was released over a year more recently than the GTX 675M, and so the GTX 880M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 675M.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GeForce GTX 880M 4GB and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 675M has 32 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 880M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is noticeably better than the GTX 880M.

The GeForce GTX 880M 4GB has 1536 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 880M is 1525 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 675M is 952. The GTX 880M having 573 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 675M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GTX 880M transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 675M. This means that the GTX 880M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 675M.

The GeForce GTX 880M 4GB requires 122 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 675M requires 78 Watts more than the GTX 880M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 675M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 880M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed954 MHzvs620 MHz
Boost Clock993 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK104Fermi GF114 (x2)
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date12 Mar 2014vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
9.6
green tick vs
9.3
1920x1080
7.6
green tick vs
7.3
2560x1440
5.5
green tick vs
5.3
3840x2160
3.8
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth160GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1536vs768
Actual Shader Performance73%vs46%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units128vs128
Texture Rate122.1 GTexel/svs79.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs64
Pixel Rate30.5 GPixel/svs39.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power122 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4900MQ 4-Core 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 880M 4GB is a high-end mobile graphics card and the fastest as of Spring 2014.
It is based on a full variant of the GK104 Core of the 28nm Kepler architecture and thus offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 954MHz and goes up to 993MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1250MHz. The rated TDP is clearly above 100W and 122W, on average.
It is thus just a faster clocked GeForce GTX 780M. Theoretically, its performance might be up to 15% better than its predecessors, but since its memory bandwidth remains the same, expect at most a 10% performance boost, depending on the 3D Game.
Therefore, GeForce GTX 880M will only be seen on very large note books and it needs to be paired with at least 8GB of RAM and a Strong Quad Core. The card is suited for 1080p and even the most demanding games should run fluently at high settings.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body