Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 900 XGL Radeon HD 4250
Red Dead Redemption 2 4532% 4512%
Doom Eternal 3883% 3866%
Cyberpunk 2077 6264% 6236%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4532% 4512%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2757% 2745%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6264% 6236%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6264% 6236%
Grand Theft Auto VI 6978% 6947%
Need For Speed Heat 4532% 4512%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 78% 78%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4250 are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro4 900 XGL.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 260 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 900 XGL, but the Quadro4 900 XGL has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 4250. As a result, the Quadro4 900 XGL exhibits a 0.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon HD 4250. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Radeon HD 4250 has a 260 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 900 XGL and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon HD 4250 providing 1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. The Radeon HD 4250 supports up to DirectX 10.1, so pixeling performance is not particularly relevant for this GPU. It would be relevant for comparing the Quadro4 900 XGL with other old GPUs, but in this case it is probably safe to say that the Radeon HD 4250 is superior.

The Radeon HD 4250 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 900 XGL, and so the Radeon HD 4250 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 900 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon HD 4250 has 384 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 900 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Quadro4 900 XGL has superior memory performance.

The Quadro4 900 XGL has 5.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 4250, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 900 XGL is marginally better than the Radeon HD 4250.

The Quadro4 900 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 4250 has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 900 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 4250 is 15. The Radeon HD 4250 having 14 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro4 900 XGL performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 4250 transistor size technology is 95 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 900 XGL. This means that the Radeon HD 4250 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 900 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Radeon HD 4250 should consume less power than the Quadro4 900 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs560 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28GL A2RS880
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs30 Mar 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed325 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs32 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth5.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs40
Actual Shader Performance0%vs1%
Technology150nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs4
Texture Rate2.4 GTexel/svs2.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate1.2 GPixel/svs2.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10.1
Shader Model1.3vs4.1
Open GL1.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 900 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4600, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Radeon HD 4250 (IGP) is an integrated GPU on the AMD 880G Chipset.
It's based on the RS880 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 32-bit memory interface of either DDR2 (more commonly) or DDR3. The central unit runs, commonly, at up to 560MHz and the memory clock's operating speed depends on the system RAM's speed.
Radeon HD 4250's performance depends on the users system configuration which will define the operating memory clock's speed and on the desktop manufacturer which decides its central unit's speed.
Therefore, Radeon HD 4250 may offer similar performance to Radeon HD 4290 (and even Radeon HD 4200) but never close to the dedicated Radeon HD 4350. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body