Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL GeForce 3 Ti 200
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 7033%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 9700%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 4300%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 9700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 7033%
Doom Eternal 6870% 6033%
FIFA 20 4218% 3700%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 10800%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 7033%
Halo: Reach 2476% 2167%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 200 are very slightly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL.

The Quadro4 550 XGL was released less than a year after the 3 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 550 XGL and the GeForce 3 Ti 200 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the Quadro4 550 XGL and the GeForce 3 Ti 200 are the same, which means the Quadro4 550 XGL and the 3 Ti have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 3 Ti 200 has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs175 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3NV20
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs01 Oct 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs8.1
Shader Model1.3vs1.1
Open GL1.5vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.GeForce 3 Ti 200 is a very old GPU part of the GeForce 3 Series released by NVIDIA in 2001.
It only supports DirectX up to 8.1 so even DirectX 9 games are most likely unplayable.
That being said, the 64MB video memory and very low core clock doom its performance from the start. Therefore, almost all today's games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body