Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL GeForce4 Ti 4600
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 4303%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 5949%
Doom Eternal 6870% 3686%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 2616%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 4303%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 5949%
FIFA 20 4218% 2246%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 6628%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11036% 5949%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 4303%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600 are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL.

The Quadro4 550 XGL was released less than a year after the Ti 4600, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Ti 4600 has 64 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 550 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Ti 4600 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Ti 4600 has 2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 550 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the Ti 4600 is marginally better than the Quadro4 550 XGL.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce4 Ti 4600 has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs300 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3NV25
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs06 Feb 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs325 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs5.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs8.1
Shader Model1.3vs1.3
Open GL1.5vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.GeForce4 Ti 4600 is part of the GeForce4 GPUS released by NVIDIA in 2002. Only compatible with DirectX 8.1 or less and with a max memory of 128 MB, it can't play today's games.
Still, games before 2004 should be fully playable at max settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body