Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL GeForce FX 5700
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 8392%
Halo: Reach 2476% 2598%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 8392%
Doom Eternal 6870% 7202%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 11567%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 12876%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 5138%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11036% 11567%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 8392%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce FX 5700.

The GeForce FX 5700 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so the GeForce FX 5700 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 550 XGL.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce FX 5700 has 192 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 550 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce FX 5700 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce FX 5700 has 0.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 550 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce FX 5700 is marginally better than the Quadro4 550 XGL.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce FX 5700 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce FX 5700 is 2. The GeForce FX 5700 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro4 550 XGL performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs425 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3NV36
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs01 Oct 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0b
Shader Model1.3vs2.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.The top-to-bottom family of NVIDIA GeForce FX GPUs provide both high-performance gaming for enthusiasts and best-in-class features for mainstream users. Whether you're a bleeding-edge gamer who desires the most advanced gaming technology available, or a PC user in search of the perfect combination of power, performance, and value--GeForce FX solutions deliver.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body