Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Halo: Reach 2476% 5971%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 26150%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 11686%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 19007%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 19007%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 26150%
Doom Eternal 6870% 16329%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 29096%
FIFA 20 4218% 10079%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 19007%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 550 XGL.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 64 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 550 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 0.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is marginally better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro4 550 XGL performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3NV44
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0c
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body