Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL Radeon X1300 LE
Halo: Reach 2476% 2536%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 11295%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 5016%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 8195%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 8195%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 11295%
Doom Eternal 6870% 7032%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 12574%
FIFA 20 4218% 4319%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 8195%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are marginally better than the AMD Radeon X1300 LE .

The X1300 LE was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so the X1300 LE is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 550 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 550 XGL and the Radeon X1300 LE have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 1.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the X1300 LE, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is marginally better than the X1300 LE.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1300 LE has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3RV515 LE
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs05 Oct 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.Radeon X1300 LE is an entry-level GPU based on the 90nm variant of the R500 architecture.
It's based on the RV515 LE Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 450MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 250MHz.
Radeon X1300 LE is oriented for low power consumption. It does not offer any DVI ports and its performance is expected to be lower than X1050 GPUs and is therefore not suited for any 3D gaming, at all. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body