Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL Intel 82845G
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 26650%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 36650%
Doom Eternal 6870% 22900%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 16400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 26650%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 36650%
FIFA 20 4218% 14150%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 40775%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11036% 36650%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 26650%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are massively better than the Intel 82845G.

The 82845G was released less than a year after the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 64 MB video memory, but the 82845G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Quadro4 550 XGL and the 82845G have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Quadro4 550 XGL is 1 and by the 82845G is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The 82845G requires 6 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 550 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3Brookdale
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs01 May 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed200 MHzvs133 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs1.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-6 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs7.0
Shader Model1.3vs-
Open GL1.5vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.Intel 82845G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Celeron and Celeron D CPUs and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 and the performance depends on the CPU it's embedded. It only supports DDR so the memory bandwidth is really low.
Today's modern games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body