Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 29622%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 40733%
Doom Eternal 6870% 25456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 29622%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 18233%
Halo: Reach 2476% 9344%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 40733%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11036% 40733%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 45317%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 29622%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB.

The Quadro4 550 XGL was released less than a year after the 2 MX, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 32 MB more video memory than the 2 MX, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro4 550 XGL also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 1.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 2 MX, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is marginally better than the 2 MX.

Both the Quadro4 550 XGL and the GeForce 2 MX 100/200 32MB have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Quadro4 550 XGL is 1 and by the 2 MX is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs175 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3NV11
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs03 Mar 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs32 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs1.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1600x1200
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs-
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs7
Shader Model1.3vs-
Open GL1.5vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.GeForce2 MX 100/200 32MB is part of the GeForce2 Series released by NVIDIA in 2000/2001. With very few dedicated memory and only DirectX 7.0 (and less) support, even games from 2002 will require reduced settings. Therefore, it can't play today's current games.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body