Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL Radeon Xpress 1100 128mb
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 29300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 21300%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 13100%
Halo: Reach 2476% 6700%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 29300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 21300%
FIFA 20 4218% 11300%
Doom Eternal 6870% 18300%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 32600%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 21300%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1100 128mb.

The Xpress 1100 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so the Xpress 1100 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 550 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Xpress 1100 has 64 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 550 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Xpress 1100, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is marginally better than the Xpress 1100.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 2 Shader Processing Units but the Xpress 1100 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs300 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs01 May 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed200 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections2vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.The Radeon R300 (introduced August 2002) is the third generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The line features 3D acceleration based upon Direct3D 9.0 and OpenGL 2.0, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R200 design. R300 was the first fully Direct3D 9-capable consumer graphics chip. The processors also include 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. R300 refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. R300 and its derivatives would form the basis for ATI's consumer and professional product lines for over 3 years.
The integrated graphics processor based upon R300 is called Xpress 200.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body