Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 550 XGL Radeon Xpress X200
Red Dead Redemption 2 8006% 16362%
Doom Eternal 6870% 14054%
Cyberpunk 2077 11036% 22515%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8006% 16362%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 4900% 10054%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 11036% 22515%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 11036% 22515%
Grand Theft Auto VI 12286% 25054%
Need For Speed Heat 8006% 16362%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 212% 534%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 550 XGL are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress X200.

The Radeon Xpress X200 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 550 XGL, and so the Radeon Xpress X200 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 550 XGL.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 550 XGL has 64 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress X200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Quadro4 550 XGL and the Radeon Xpress X200 have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the Quadro4 550 XGL is 1 and by the Radeon Xpress X200 is 0. Knowing that the shader performance of the Quadro4 550 XGL is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed270 MHzvs300 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV17 A3RS480
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs01 Nov 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory64 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed200 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate1.1 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0
Shader Model1.3vs-
Open GL1.5vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 550 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 MX 460, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size, as well as a lower clocked central unit.Radeon Xpress X200 is a very old GPU part of the Radeon Xpress Series released by ATI, now known as AMD, between 2004 and 2005.
It's an integrated GPU that uses up to 128MB of DDR, clocked at either 200MHz or 400MHz, system memory.
Its performance is horrible, even for today's forgiving games.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body