Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Quadro4 700 XGL | Intel 865G |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5816% | 19725% |
Hitman 3 | 7596% | 25689% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 5311% | 18032% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 5136% | 17444% |
FIFA 21 | 2884% | 9900% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 8225% | 27795% |
Far Cry 6 | 8460% | 28584% |
Genshin Impact | 5816% | 19725% |
Battlefield 6 | 7596% | 25689% |
Resident Evil 8 | 5816% | 19725% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 700 XGL are massively better than the Intel 865G.
The 865G was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 700 XGL, and so the 865G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 700 XGL.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Quadro4 700 XGL has 48 MB more video memory than the 865G, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro4 700 XGL also has superior memory performance overall.
The Quadro4 700 XGL has 3.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 865G, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 700 XGL is marginally better than the 865G.
The Quadro4 700 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units but the 865G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 700 XGL.
Core Speed | 275 MHz | ![]() | vs | 200 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | NV25 A2 | Springdale | |||
OC Potential | Poor |
![]() |
vs | - | |
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 19 Feb 2002 | vs | ![]() | 01 May 2003 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | 64 MB | ![]() | vs | N/A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 225 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | 64 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR | ![]() | vs | ![]() | DDR |
Memory Bandwidth | 3.6GB/sec | ![]() | vs | - | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | - | |
Technology | 150nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 8 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 2.2 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 4 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 1.1 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | - | vs | ![]() | 1280x1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | 13 Watts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 8.1 | ![]() | vs | 7.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 1.3 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Open GL | 1.5 | ![]() | vs | 1.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | no | |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Quadro4 700 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers, lower memory bandwidth and reduced frame buffer size. | Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2. It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |