Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 750 XGL GeForce 6200 TurboCache
Cyberpunk 2077 5494% 20079%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 5016% 18355%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 4850% 17757%
FIFA 21 2722% 10079%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4850% 17757%
Watch Dogs Legion 5296% 19364%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 7920% 28829%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7771% 28293%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 5197% 19007%
Genshin Impact 5494% 20079%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 750 XGL are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The GeForce 6200 TurboCache was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 750 XGL, and so the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 750 XGL.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 750 XGL and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro4 750 XGL has 0.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 750 XGL is marginally better than the GeForce 6200 TurboCache.

The Quadro4 750 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 6200 TurboCache has 7. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 750 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6200 TurboCache is 2. The GeForce 6200 TurboCache having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro4 750 XGL performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV25 A2NV44
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date19 Feb 2002vs02 Jan 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed225 MHzvs350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.6GB/secvs2.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs7
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0c
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 750 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers and lower memory bandwidth.The NVIDIA GeForce 6500 and 6200 graphics processing units (GPUs) featuring NVIDIA TurboCache technology take full advantage of the PCI Express bus to deliver the turbocharged system performance you need to play all the hottest games and applications.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-