Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon 9000 Series 64MB
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 7543%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 10400%
Doom Eternal 4159% 6471%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 4614%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 7543%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 10400%
FIFA 20 2539% 3971%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 11579%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 10400%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 7543%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the AMD Radeon 9000 Series 64MB.

The Quadro4 780 XGL was released less than a year after the 9000 Series, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 64 MB more video memory than the 9000 Series, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the 9000 Series has superior memory performance.

The 9000 Series has 3.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the 9000 Series is marginally better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Both the Quadro4 780 XGL and the Radeon 9000 Series 64MB have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28RV250
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Aug 2002
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections2vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs8.1
Shader Model1.3vs1.4
Open GL1.5vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body