Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL GeForce 3 Ti 200
Halo: Reach 1474% 2167%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 9700%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 4300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 7033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 7033%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 9700%
Doom Eternal 4159% 6033%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 10800%
FIFA 20 2539% 3700%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 7033%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 3 Ti 200.

The Quadro4 780 XGL was released over a year more recently than the 3 Ti, and so the Quadro4 780 XGL is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the 3 Ti.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 64 MB more video memory than the 3 Ti, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro4 780 XGL also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 1.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the 3 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is marginally better than the 3 Ti.

Both the Quadro4 780 XGL and the GeForce 3 Ti 200 have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs175 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28NV20
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Oct 2001
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs8.1
Shader Model1.3vs1.1
Open GL1.5vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.GeForce 3 Ti 200 is a very old GPU part of the GeForce 3 Series released by NVIDIA in 2001.
It only supports DirectX up to 8.1 so even DirectX 9 games are most likely unplayable.
That being said, the 64MB video memory and very low core clock doom its performance from the start. Therefore, almost all today's games are unplayable, even at the lowest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body