Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon HD 4350 1GB
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 3192%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4423%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2731%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1931%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 3192%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4423%
FIFA 20 2539% 1654%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4931%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 4423%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 3192%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 4350 1GB are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 4350 has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the Quadro4 780 XGL. This results in the HD 4350 providing 2.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since the HD 4350 supports up to DirectX 10.1.

The HD 4350 has a 325 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 4350 providing 1.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. The HD 4350 supports up to DirectX 10.1, so pixeling performance is not particularly relevant for this GPU. It would be relevant for comparing the Quadro4 780 XGL with other old GPUs, but in this case it is probably safe to say that the HD 4350 is superior.

The HD 4350 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the HD 4350 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 4350 has 896 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 780 XGL, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 4350 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 4350 has 3.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the HD 4350 is marginally better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 4350 1GB has 80. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the HD 4350 is 34. The HD 4350 having 33 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 4350 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 4350 transistor size technology is 95 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 780 XGL. This means that the HD 4350 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 780 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD 4350 should consume less power than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Radeon HD 4350 1GB requires 20 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD 4350, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28R700 RV710
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support - vs Poor
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs30 Sep 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
3.1
1600x900 - vs green tick
2.1
1920x1080 - vs green tick
1.4
2560x1440 - vs green tick
1.1
3840x2160 - vs green tick
0.5

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs80
Actual Shader Performance0%vs2%
Technology150nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs8
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs4.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs2.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-20 Watts
Recommended PSU-300 Watts & 16 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10.1
Shader Model1.3vs4.1
Open GL1.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Celeron E1200 Dual-Core 1.6GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.With all the latest features, the ATI Radeon™ HD 4350 graphics card delivers the performance you need to take your high-definition experience to the next level at home, work and play. Add this graphics card to your PC and watch Blu-ray movies and HD content play with incredible visual fidelity, and view digital photos with over 1 billion colors2. Enjoy unprecedented levels of graphics realism and play the latest games with support for Microsoft DirectX® 10.1. Do it all with break-through efficiency that doesn’t compromise performance.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body