Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL GeForce FX 5700
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 8392%
Halo: Reach 1474% 2598%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 11567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 8392%
Doom Eternal 4159% 7202%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 11567%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 91% 227%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 12876%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 11567%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 5138%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce FX 5700.

The GeForce FX 5700 was released less than a year after the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce FX 5700 has 128 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 780 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Quadro4 780 XGL has superior memory performance.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 0.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce FX 5700, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is marginally better than the GeForce FX 5700.

Both the Quadro4 780 XGL and the GeForce FX 5700 have 4 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce FX 5700 is 2 and by the Quadro4 780 XGL is 2. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce FX 5700 is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs425 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28NV36
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Oct 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0b
Shader Model1.3vs2.0
Open GL1.5vs1.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.The top-to-bottom family of NVIDIA GeForce FX GPUs provide both high-performance gaming for enthusiasts and best-in-class features for mainstream users. Whether you're a bleeding-edge gamer who desires the most advanced gaming technology available, or a PC user in search of the perfect combination of power, performance, and value--GeForce FX solutions deliver.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body