Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon HD 2400 Series
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 3420%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2926%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4736%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 3420%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 2071%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4736%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 4736%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 5278%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 3420%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 91% 36%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 2400 Series are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 2400 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the HD 2400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 2400 has 128 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 780 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Quadro4 780 XGL has superior memory performance.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 2400, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is marginally better than the HD 2400.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 2400 Series has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the HD 2400 is 16. The HD 2400 having 15 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro4 780 XGL performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon HD 2400 Series requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28RV610
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs28 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs40
Actual Shader Performance0%vs1%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10
Shader Model1.3vs4.0
Open GL1.5vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Radeon HD 2400 Series is not a GPU but instead a combination between Radeon HD 2400 Pro and Radeon HD 2400 XT whose rank is a balance between the two and that exists for System Requirements purposes only.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body