Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Intel Media Accelerator HD
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 3094%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4288%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2646%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 3094%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1870%
Halo: Reach 1474% 915%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4288%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 4288%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4781%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 3094%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel Media Accelerator HD are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Media Accelerator HD was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the Media Accelerator HD is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the Media Accelerator HD does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units but the Media Accelerator HD does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Media Accelerator HD requires 45 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs650 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs25 Jan 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed275 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs-
Memory TypeDDRvs-
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs-
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1600x1200
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections2vs-
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-45 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs11
Shader Model1.3vs-
Open GL1.5vs-
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.The Intel Graphics Media Accelerator, or GMA, is Intel's current line of integrated graphics processors built into various motherboard chipsets.
These integrated graphics products allow a computer to be built without a separate graphics card, which can reduce cost, power consumption and noise. They are commonly found on low-priced notebook and desktop computers as well as business computers, which do not need high levels of graphics capability. 90% of all PCs sold have integrated graphics. They rely on the computer's main memory for storage, which imposes a performance penalty, as both the CPU and GPU have to access memory over the same bus.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body