Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL FireGL V3400
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 2948%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4088%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2521%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 2948%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4088%
FIFA 20 2539% 1524%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4558%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 4088%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 2948%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FireGL V3400 are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The FireGL V3400 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the FireGL V3400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL and the FireGL V3400 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The FireGL V3400 has 11.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the FireGL V3400 is slightly better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the FireGL V3400 has 5. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the FireGL V3400 is 2. The FireGL V3400 having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FireGL V3400 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the FireGL V3400, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs500 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs14 Aug 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs16GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs5
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs2
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU-300 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0c
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.The ATI FireGL range of video cards, renamed to FirePro 3D in late 2008, is the series specifically for CAD (Computer Aided Design) and DCC (Digital Content Creation) software, usually found in workstations. The FireGL line is designed for multimedia content creation programs, such as 3DS Max, and mechanical engineering design software such as Solidworks, whereas Radeon counterparts are suited towards video games. FireGL drivers were built with maximum image quality and pixel precision, with CAD specific functionalities such as the recently introduced AutoDetection Technology to tune the parameters inside the driver to achieve maximum performance for predefined list of software. However, because the drivers are also based on the Catalyst drivers made for the Radeon line, it makes them suitable for gaming, at the expense of probable compatibility issues with the very latest games due to the age of the drivers, with FireGL cards in theory pushing more data than their Radeon gaming counterparts.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body