Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Intel HD Graphics 2500 Desktop
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 3075%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4262%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1858%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4262%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 3075%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2630%
FIFA 20 2539% 1591%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4752%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 3075%
Halo: Reach 1474% 909%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 2500 Desktop are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Graphics 2500 has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL, but the Quadro4 780 XGL has 7 more Texture Mapping Units than the Graphics 2500. As a result, the Quadro4 780 XGL exhibits a 1.5 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Graphics 2500. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Graphics 2500 has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL, but the Quadro4 780 XGL has 3 more Render Output Units than the Graphics 2500. As a result, the Quadro4 780 XGL exhibits a 0.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the Graphics 2500. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 9 or higher, so Pixel Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The Graphics 2500 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the Graphics 2500 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the Graphics 2500 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the HD Graphics 2500 Desktop has 24. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the Graphics 2500 is 76. The Graphics 2500 having 75 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Graphics 2500 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Graphics 2500 transistor size technology is 128 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 780 XGL. This means that the Graphics 2500 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 780 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Graphics 2500 should consume less power than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs650 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28Ivy Bridge
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Apr 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed275 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs12.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs24
Actual Shader Performance0%vs4%
Technology150nmvs22nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs1
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs0.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs1
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs0.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs11
Shader Model1.3vs5.0
Open GL1.5vs4.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-1024x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Intel HD Graphics 2500 DEsktop are the successors of Intel HD Graphics 2000.
They come embedded on the new Intel Core i-5 Ivy Bridge CPUS.
The new features include DirectX 11 support, Shader Version of 5.0 and openGL Version of up to 4.0.
They offer 6 Execution Units (24 Shader Processing Units) and are manufactured with a 22nm technology.
Benchmarks indicate that today's games can be played at the lowest settings smoothly.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body