Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Quadro FX 560
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4149%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 2992%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1808%
Halo: Reach 1474% 883%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4149%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 2992%
FIFA 20 2539% 1547%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2559%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4625%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 2992%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 560 are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro FX 560 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the Quadro FX 560 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL and the Quadro FX 560 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro FX 560 has 14.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 560 is slightly better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 560 has 12. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 560 is 4. The Quadro FX 560 having 3 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro FX 560 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro FX 560 requires 30 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28G73 GL
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs20 Apr 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs600 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs19.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs12
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-30 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0c
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Quadro FX 560 is a professional Graphics Card with driver support for professional applications.
It's based on the G73 architecture (GL Core) and offers 12 Pixel Shaders, on a 128-bit memory interface of GDDR3.
It's related to desktop GeForce 7600 GT but should offer performance similar (though worse) to GeForce 7600 GS, due to the similarities.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body