Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon X1300 LE
Halo: Reach 1474% 2536%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 11295%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 8195%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 5016%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 8195%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 11295%
Doom Eternal 4159% 7032%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 12574%
FIFA 20 2539% 4319%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 8195%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the AMD Radeon X1300 LE .

The X1300 LE was released over a year more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the X1300 LE is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 64 MB more video memory than the X1300 LE, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro4 780 XGL also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 2.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the X1300 LE, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is marginally better than the X1300 LE.

Both the Quadro4 780 XGL and the Radeon X1300 LE have 4 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28RV515 LE
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs05 Oct 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs64 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Radeon X1300 LE is an entry-level GPU based on the 90nm variant of the R500 architecture.
It's based on the RV515 LE Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 450MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 250MHz.
Radeon X1300 LE is oriented for low power consumption. It does not offer any DVI ports and its performance is expected to be lower than X1050 GPUs and is therefore not suited for any 3D gaming, at all. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body