Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon HD 2400 XT
Cyberpunk 2077 5085% 4922%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 4685% 4535%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 5224% 5057%
Genshin Impact 5131% 4967%
eFootball PES 2021 2539% 2456%
Marvel's Avengers 4854% 4698%
Watch Dogs Legion 4946% 4788%
FIFA 21 2539% 2456%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 7400% 7165%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4530% 4384%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 2400 XT are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 2400 XT has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed but 4 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the Quadro4 780 XGL. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the HD 2400 XT manages to provide 0.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since the HD 2400 XT supports up to DirectX 10.

The HD 2400 XT has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 2400 XT providing 1.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. The HD 2400 XT supports up to DirectX 10, so pixeling performance is not particularly relevant for this GPU. It would be relevant for comparing the Quadro4 780 XGL with other old GPUs, but in this case it is probably safe to say that the HD 2400 XT is superior.

The HD 2400 XT was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the HD 2400 XT is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 2400 XT has 128 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 780 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 2400 XT also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 2400 XT has 3.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 XT is marginally better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 2400 XT has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the HD 2400 XT is 26. The HD 2400 XT having 25 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 2400 XT delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 2400 XT transistor size technology is 85 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 780 XGL. This means that the HD 2400 XT is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 780 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD 2400 XT should consume less power than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Radeon HD 2400 XT requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs650 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28RV610
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs28 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs8GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs40
Actual Shader Performance0%vs1%
Technology150nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs2.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs2.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10
Shader Model1.3vs4.0
Open GL1.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Pentium D 950 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Radeon HD 2400 XT is an entry-level GPU based on the 65nm variant of the second unified shader architecture, R600.
It's based on the RV610 Core and offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs a 64-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. The central unit runs at 650MHz and the memory clock runs at up to 500MHz. It's therefore a higher clocked Radeon HD 2400 Pro, paired with GDDR3 and should be considerably faster.
Today's games only playable at unattractive resolutions and using low (likely) or medium (maybe) presets. DirectX 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-