Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Intel GMA 3000
Halo: Reach 1474% 2079%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 9323%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 6759%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 4131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 6759%
Doom Eternal 4159% 5797%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 9323%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 10381%
FIFA 20 2539% 3554%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 6759%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the Intel GMA 3000.

The GMA 3000 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GMA 3000 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the GMA 3000 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the GMA 3000 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the GMA 3000 has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GMA 3000 is 0. The Quadro4 780 XGL having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro4 780 XGL delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GMA 3000.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs-
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28-
OC Potential Poor vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Jul 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed275 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs8
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs9.0
Shader Model1.3vs3.0
Open GL1.5vs-
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Intel GMA 3000 is an integrated GPU that might come with some of Intel's old chipsets. Its performance, as well as its specifications will depend from chipset to chipset.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body