Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 6893%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 9508%
Doom Eternal 4159% 5913%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 6893%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 4214%
Halo: Reach 1474% 2122%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 9508%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 9508%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 10586%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 6893%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E.

The HD 2400 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL, but the Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 2400. As a result, the Quadro4 780 XGL exhibits a 0.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the HD 2400. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The HD 2400 has a 250 MHz higher core clock speed than the Quadro4 780 XGL and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 2400 providing 1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. The HD 2400 supports up to DirectX 10, so pixeling performance is not particularly relevant for this GPU. It would be relevant for comparing the Quadro4 780 XGL with other old GPUs, but in this case it is probably safe to say that the HD 2400 is superior.

The HD 2400 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the HD 2400 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The HD 2400 has 128 MB more video memory than the Quadro4 780 XGL, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 2400 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 2400 has 2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro4 780 XGL, which means that the memory performance of the HD 2400 is marginally better than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the HD 2400 is 21. The HD 2400 having 20 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 2400 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD 2400 transistor size technology is 85 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro4 780 XGL. This means that the HD 2400 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro4 780 XGL. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the HD 2400 should consume less power than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

The Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs525 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28RV610
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed275 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs40
Actual Shader Performance0%vs1%
Technology150nmvs65nm
Texture Mapping Units8vs4
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs2.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units4vs4
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs2.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10
Shader Model1.3vs4.0
Open GL1.5vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor-Intel Pentium D 940 3.2 GHz
Recommended RAM-2 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution-800x600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.Radeon HD 2400 Pro PCI-E is a variant of the reference Radeon HD 2400 Pro that features a PCI-E interface instead of AGP and performs like the AGP version.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body