Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro4 780 XGL HD Xeon E3-1235
Red Dead Redemption 2 4854% 2975%
Doom Eternal 4159% 2544%
Cyberpunk 2077 6706% 4124%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4854% 2975%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 2956% 1797%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 6706% 4124%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 6706% 4124%
Grand Theft Auto VI 7469% 4598%
Need For Speed Heat 4854% 2975%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 91% 18%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Xeon E3-1235 are significantly better than the Nvidia Quadro4 780 XGL.

The HD Xeon E3-1235 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro4 780 XGL, and so the HD Xeon E3-1235 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro4 780 XGL when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 128 MB video memory, but the HD Xeon E3-1235 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro4 780 XGL has 4 Shader Processing Units and the HD Xeon E3-1235 has 12. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro4 780 XGL is 1 and the actual shader performance of the HD Xeon E3-1235 is 32. The HD Xeon E3-1235 having 31 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD Xeon E3-1235 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro4 780 XGL.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed275 MHzvs850 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV28Sandy Bridge
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Nov 2002vs01 Apr 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed275 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth4.4GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4vs12
Actual Shader Performance0%vs2%
Technology150nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate2.2 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate1.1 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX8.1vs10.1
Shader Model1.3vs4.0
Open GL1.5vs3.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewQuadro4 780 XGL is a professional graphics card that will deliver similar gaming performance to GeForce4 Ti 4400, though worse due to the lack of support for gaming drivers.HD Xeon E3-1235 is a specific version of the Intel HD P3000 Graphics that comes with the CPU 'Intel Xeon E3-1235'.
Based on the Sandy Bridge architecture, it also features 12 Shader Processing Units, supports openGL up to 3.1, Shader up to 4.0 and DirectX 10.1. Just like other integrated GPUs, it uses system memory and the max memory supported is DDR3-1333, meaning the max memory speed is 667MHz. The CPUs only supports up to dual-channel memory, meaning a 128 bits bus is the largest bus width supported. It comes clocked at 850MHz but the Turbo Boost of the CPU can set it up to 1350MHz.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is on level with an entry-level NVIDIA GeForce GT 410M.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body