Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M295X 4GB GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Red Dead Redemption 2 74% 98%
Cyberpunk 2077 139% 172%
Doom Eternal 50% 70%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 7% 22%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74% 98%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 139% 172%
FIFA 20 7% 6%
Grand Theft Auto VI 166% 203%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 139% 172%
Need For Speed Heat 74% 98%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M295X 4GB are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

The R9 M295X has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GTX 675M. This results in the R9 M295X providing 29.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M295X has a 230 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 675M, but the GTX 675M has 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 M295X. As a result, the GTX 675M exhibits a 12.5 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R9 M295X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M295X was released over a year more recently than the GTX 675M, and so the R9 M295X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 675M.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The Radeon R9 M295X 4GB and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 675M has 17.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M295X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is slightly better than the R9 M295X.

The Radeon R9 M295X 4GB has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M295X is 1132 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 675M is 952. The R9 M295X having 180 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M295X delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 675M.

The R9 M295X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 675M. This means that the R9 M295X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 675M.

The Radeon R9 M295X 4GB requires 125 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 675M requires 75 Watts more than the R9 M295X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 675M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 M295X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs620 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTongaFermi GF114 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date23 Nov 2014vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
9.9
green tick vs
9.3
1920x1080
7.9
green tick vs
7.3
2560x1440
5.7
green tick vs
5.3
3840x2160
4.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1362 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth174.3GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs green tick 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2048vs768
Actual Shader Performance54%vs46%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units128vs128
Texture Rate108.8 GTexel/svs79.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs64
Pixel Rate27.2 GPixel/svs39.7 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power125 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.2vs11
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4930MX 4-Core 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R9 M295X 4GB is an upcoming high-end mobile Graphics Card, based on the second revision of the GCN architecture.
It offers a GPU codenamed "Tonga" which is at essence an upgraded Tahiti XTX GPU (used on Radeon HD 7970 GE) and features 2048 Shader Processing Units, 128 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5.
The clock frequencies are not known yet.
Expect a rated board TDP that should clearly surpass the 100W barrier and performance around the levels of a Radeon HD 7950.
There are no benchmarks yet but we predict Radeon R9 M295X 4GB has potential to be slightly faster than the world's most powerful mobile Graphics Card as of June 2014 - GeForce GTX 880M.
GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body