Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce 6150 LE | GeForce 6100 nForce 405 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 22961% | 22500% |
Hitman 3 | 29900% | 29300% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 20992% | 20570% |
Resident Evil 8 | 22961% | 22500% |
FIFA 21 | 11533% | 11300% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 32349% | 31700% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 20308% | 19900% |
The Medium | 28676% | 28100% |
Genshin Impact | 22961% | 22500% |
Far Cry 6 | 33267% | 32600% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6100 nForce 405 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.
The 6100 nForce was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the 6100 nForce is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The GeForce 6150 LE and the GeForce 6100 nForce 405 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The memory bandwidth of the GeForce 6150 LE and the GeForce 6100 nForce 405 are the same, which means the GeForce 6150 LE and the 6100 nForce have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.
Both the GeForce 6150 LE and the GeForce 6100 nForce 405 have 2 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.
Core Speed | 425 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 425 MHz |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | C51 | MCP51 | |||
OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 11 Oct 2004 | vs | ![]() | 20 Oct 2005 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | N/A | vs | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | - | vs | - | ||
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Type | - | vs | - | ||
Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | - | ||
L2 Cache | - | vs | - | ||
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 0% |
Technology | 90nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 0.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 0.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 9.0c | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 3.0 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Open GL | 2.1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |