Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce 6150 LE | GeForce 7025 nForce 630a |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 22961% | 19725% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 20992% | 18032% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 20308% | 17444% |
FIFA 21 | 11533% | 9900% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 32349% | 27795% |
Far Cry 6 | 33267% | 28584% |
Genshin Impact | 22961% | 19725% |
Hitman 3 | 29900% | 25689% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 22145% | 19023% |
Mafia: Definitive Edition | 32961% | 28321% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 7025 nForce 630a are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.
The 7025 nForce was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the 7025 nForce is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The 7025 nForce has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
Both the GeForce 6150 LE and the GeForce 7025 nForce 630a have 2 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.
Core Speed | 425 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 425 MHz |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | C51 | MCP68S | |||
OC Potential | - | vs | - | ||
Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 11 Oct 2004 | vs | ![]() | 01 Sep 2007 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
Memory | N/A | vs | ![]() | N/A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | - | vs | - | ||
Memory Bus | 128 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit |
Memory Type | - | vs | ![]() | DDR2 | |
Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | - | ||
L2 Cache | - | vs | - | ||
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 0% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 0% |
Technology | 90nm | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Mapping Units | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Texture Rate | 0.4 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Render Output Units | 1 | ![]() | vs | - | |
Pixel Rate | 0.4 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | - | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | 1920x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 9.0c | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 9.0c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 3.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 3.0 |
Open GL | 2.1 | ![]() | vs | 2.0 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Weak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly. | NVIDIA GeForce motherboard GPUs (mGPUs) make experiencing the GeForce difference more affordable than ever. Designed for both AMD and Intel platforms, GeForce motherboard GPUs support the latest graphics technologies including DirectX 10, CUDA, PhysX, PureVideo HD and Hybrid SLI. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |