Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Radeon X1300 256MB
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 6432%
Hitman 3 29900% 8397%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 5874%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 5680%
FIFA 21 11533% 3195%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 9091%
Far Cry 6 33267% 9351%
Genshin Impact 22961% 6432%
Battlefield 6 29900% 8397%
Resident Evil 8 22961% 6432%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1300 256MB are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The Radeon X1300 256MB was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the Radeon X1300 256MB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1300 256MB has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1300 256MB has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the Radeon X1300 256MB, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the GeForce 6150 LE.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51RV515
OC Potential - vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs01 Dec 2005
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed-vs250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU-350 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Radeon X1300 256MB is an entry-level GPU based on the 90nm variant of the R500 architecture.
It's based on the RV515 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 128-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 450MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 250MHz.
Radeon X1300 is not much more powerful than R300 and R400 based Radeon X1050 GPUs and so its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-