Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Quadro FX 1300
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 6041%
Hitman 3 29900% 7889%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 5517%
The Medium 28676% 7563%
Resident Evil 8 22961% 6041%
FIFA 21 11533% 2998%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 5335%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 8541%
Genshin Impact 22961% 6041%
Far Cry 6 33267% 8786%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1300 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The GeForce 6150 LE was released less than a year after the Quadro FX 1300, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 1300 has 128 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 1300 has 3. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The Quadro FX 1300 requires 55 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6150 LE. We would recommend a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the Quadro FX 1300, but we do not have a recommended PSU wattage for the GeForce 6150 LE.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs350 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51NV38GL
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs28 Jun 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs275 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs8.8GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs3
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs-
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-55 Watts
Recommended PSU-350 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0b
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-