Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Radeon X1050 256MB
Hitman 3 29900% 9088%
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 6963%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 6359%
Resident Evil 8 22961% 6963%
FIFA 21 11533% 3463%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 9838%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 6150%
Genshin Impact 22961% 6963%
Far Cry 6 33267% 10119%
The Medium 28676% 8713%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1050 256MB are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The GeForce 6150 LE has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon X1050 256MB, but the Radeon X1050 256MB has 7 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Radeon X1050 256MB exhibits a 2.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.

The GeForce 6150 LE has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon X1050 256MB, but the Radeon X1050 256MB has 7 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Radeon X1050 256MB exhibits a 2.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon X1050 256MB was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the Radeon X1050 256MB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1050 256MB has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 256MB has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, the Radeon X1050 256MB has 2.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate, 2.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate, and 10.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth, so should have a marginally faster performance than the GeForce 6150 LE.

The GeForce 6150 LE transistor size technology is 20 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon X1050 256MB. This means that the GeForce 6150 LE is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon X1050 256MB. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 6150 LE should consume less power than the Radeon X1050 256MB.

The Radeon X1050 256MB requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6150 LE.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51RV410
OC Potential - vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs01 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed-vs333 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs10.7GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology90nmvs110nm
Texture Mapping Units1vs8
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs3.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units1vs8
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs3.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-24 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0
Shader Model3.0vs2.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R400 architecture.
It's based on the RV410 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 8 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R400 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-