Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Radeon X1050 XT
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 6547%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 5979%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 5782%
FIFA 21 11533% 3253%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 9253%
Far Cry 6 33267% 9518%
Genshin Impact 22961% 6547%
Hitman 3 29900% 8547%
Watch Dogs Legion 22145% 6312%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 32961% 9429%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1050 XT are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The X1050 XT was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the X1050 XT is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The X1050 XT has 128 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 XT has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and the actual shader performance of the X1050 XT is 2. The X1050 XT having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the X1050 XT delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 6150 LE.

The Radeon X1050 XT requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6150 LE.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51RV410
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs07 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs1.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs8
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-24 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0
Shader Model3.0vs2.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Radeon X1050 XT is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R400 architecture.
It's based on the RV410 Core and offers 8 Pixel Shaders, 8 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 200MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 XT is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R400 architecture and not on the R500. It's instead a slightly lower clocked X700 and should offer similar performance. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-