Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Radeon X1300 PRO
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 5607%
Hitman 3 29900% 7324%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 5120%
The Medium 28676% 7021%
Resident Evil 8 22961% 5607%
FIFA 21 11533% 2779%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 4951%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 7930%
Genshin Impact 22961% 5607%
Far Cry 6 33267% 8158%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon X1300 PRO are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The Radeon X1300 PRO was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the Radeon X1300 PRO is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon X1300 PRO has 256 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1300 PRO has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon X1300 PRO is 2. The Radeon X1300 PRO having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon X1300 PRO delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 6150 LE.

The Radeon X1300 PRO requires 31 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce 6150 LE.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51RV516
OC Potential - vs Poor
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs01 Nov 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs256 MB
Memory Speed-vs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-31 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Radeon X1300 PRO is an entry-level GPU based on the 80nm variant of the R500 architecture.
It's based on the RV516 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 128-bit of standard DDR. The central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 400MHz.
Radeon X1300 PRO offers higher clock frequencies than Radeon X1300 but it also consumes relatively more power. Its performance is relatively better than X1300 but today's modern games are still only playable at the lowest settings or unplayable at all. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-