Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | GeForce 6150 LE | Rage 128 Ultra 16MB |
| Hitman 3 | 29900% | 36650% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 22961% | 28150% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 20992% | 25738% |
| FIFA 21 | 11533% | 14150% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 32349% | 39650% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 20308% | 24900% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 22961% | 28150% |
| Genshin Impact | 22961% | 28150% |
| Far Cry 6 | 33267% | 40775% |
| The Medium | 28676% | 35150% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE are noticeably better than the AMD Rage 128 Ultra 16MB.
The GeForce 6150 LE was released over three years more recently than the 128 Ultra, and so the GeForce 6150 LE is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 128 Ultra when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The 128 Ultra has 16 MB video memory, but the GeForce 6150 LE does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units but the 128 Ultra does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
| Core Speed | 425 MHz |  | vs | 90 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
| Architecture | C51 | - | |||
| OC Potential | - | vs |
| None | |
| Driver Support | - | vs | - | ||
| Release Date | 11 Oct 2004 | | vs | 01 Aug 1998 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| Memory | N/A | vs | | 16 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | - | vs | | 130 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | | vs | 64 Bit | |
| Memory Type | - | vs | | DDR | |
| Memory Bandwidth | - | vs | | 1GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | - | vs | - | ||
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 2 | | vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 0% | | vs | - | |
| Technology | 90nm | | vs | - | |
| Texture Mapping Units | 1 | | vs | - | |
| Texture Rate | 0.4 GTexel/s | | vs | - | |
| Render Output Units | 1 | | vs | - | |
| Pixel Rate | 0.4 GPixel/s | | vs | - | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | | vs | 1600x1200 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 1 | | vs | | 1 |
| DVI Connections | 1 | | vs | - | |
| HDMI Connections | 1 | | vs | - | |
| DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | - | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 9.0c | | vs | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 3.0 | | vs | - | |
| Open GL | 2.1 | | vs | 1.2 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
| Dedicated | no | vs | | yes | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | - | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | - | - | |||
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | - | - | |||
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Weak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly. | AMD desktop processors ignite the next generation of solutions. Whether it's playing games, cloud computing or editing home videos, enjoy a better experience with AMD multi-core processors. Redefine the way you play on your desktop computer and take HD gaming to the extreme with the performance of ATI graphics cards from AMD. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | - | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||