Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 6150 LE Intel GMA 3000
Cyberpunk 2077 22961% 7144%
Hitman 3 29900% 9323%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20992% 6525%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 20308% 6310%
FIFA 21 11533% 3554%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32349% 10092%
Far Cry 6 33267% 10381%
Genshin Impact 22961% 7144%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 32961% 10285%
Battlefield 6 29900% 9323%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel GMA 3000 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.

The GMA 3000 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GMA 3000 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the GMA 3000 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The GeForce 6150 LE and the GMA 3000 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GMA 3000 has 6.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6150 LE, which means that the memory performance of the GMA 3000 is marginally better than the GeForce 6150 LE.

The GeForce 6150 LE has 2 Shader Processing Units and the GMA 3000 has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and the actual shader performance of the GMA 3000 is 0. The GeForce 6150 LE having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GMA 3000 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed425 MHzvs-
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureC51-
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date11 Oct 2004vs01 Jul 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed-vs400 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth-vs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs8
Actual Shader Performance0%vs-
Technology90nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units1vs-
Texture Rate0.4 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units1vs-
Pixel Rate0.4 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs-
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9.0
Shader Model3.0vs3.0
Open GL2.1vs-
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewWeak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly.Intel GMA 3000 is an integrated GPU that might come with some of Intel's old chipsets. Its performance, as well as its specifications will depend from chipset to chipset.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-